Beyond Pink and Blue: Rethinking Colours in Babywear
- Shivani
- 8 minutes ago
- 3 min read
For decades, babywear has been dominated by two colours: pink for girls and blue for boys. This binary approach is not just about fashion choices; it reflects a larger cultural narrative about gender, identity, and expectations.

The History of Gendered Marketing in Babywear
The idea that pink is for girls and blue is for boys is actually quite recent. In the early 1900s, it was often the other way around. For example, a 1918 Ladies’ Home Journal said, “pink for boys and blue for girls,” because pink was seen as a strong, bold colour for boys, and blue was delicate and pretty for girls. After World War II, this changed. Marketers wanted to sell more clothes, so they made pink the colour for girls and blue for boys. Before the 1950s, pink and blue were just considered general baby colours without much gender meaning. In the 1960s and 70s, some people tried dressing children in gender-neutral clothes. But by the 1980s, gendered colours came back, helped by prenatal testing that told parents their baby’s gender before birth. Jo B. Paoletti, who wrote the book Pink and Blue: Telling the Boys From the Girls in America, has done lots of research on this topic.
How Colours Shape Parenting Choices in Babywear
The colours we choose for our babies subtly influence how we view and treat them. Studies suggest that parents often describe babies dressed in blue as "strong" or "active," while those in pink are more likely to be called "sweet" or "delicate." These perceptions can shape early interactions, reinforcing stereotypes before children even develop their own preferences. The nursery painted in soft pink or bold blue becomes a cultural script, guiding how parents, relatives, and even strangers perceive the child.
The Rise of Neutral and Natural Palettes
In response to these issues, many brands and parents are turning toward neutral tones whites, creams, greys, and earthy hues. These colours go beyond aesthetics; they create space for children to grow without being boxed into stereotypes from birth. Neutral palettes are also more versatile and sustainable, allowing baby clothes to be reused across siblings regardless of gender. This reduces waste, promotes mindful consumption, and supports eco-friendly practices in an industry often criticized for fast-fashion tendencies.
Why Inclusive Colours Matter
Research indicates that children’s colour preferences aren’t strictly tied to gender stereotypes, and exposure to inclusive colours helps foster open-mindedness and emotional understanding Choosing inclusive and natural palettes is more than a design preference. It is a quiet but powerful way to challenge traditional norms and give children freedom to explore their identities without being constrained by outdated marketing tactics. It also signals a shift in consumer consciousness parents want products that reflect their values of equality, sustainability, and individuality. Using soft and natural colours helps babies not to get overwhelmed and supports their brain and vision development in a healthy way. This information comes from a research study published in Frontiers in Psychology in 2022.
Heritage in Every Stitch: Gender-Neutral Babywear by MUMYU
At MUMYU, we believe babywear should not be limited to pink or blue. Our handknit collection, traditional outfits like Jabla-chola, and reusable nappies are made in natural, gender-neutral shades. Each piece is durable and designed to be passed down through generations, lovingly handcrafted by skilled artisans of Himachal Pradesh often grandmothers and mothers who carry forward this timeless tradition. With every product, we celebrate inclusivity, sustainability, and the warmth of heritage.
Conclusion
As the babywear industry evolves, it is time to move beyond pink and blue. By embracing inclusive, sustainable palettes, we not only challenge restrictive gender norms but also make more responsible choices for the planet. The next generation deserves clothes that reflect their potential, not their stereotypes.